April 1, 2025
It has been 70 days since President Trump has taken office, and boy what a ride it has been. President Trump, with Elon Musk at his side, have absolutely destroyed the Democrat planned destruction of the America (as state by Soros: "We will fundamentally change American") and has those cockroaches running for cover.
In just a little over 2 months, President Trump has more than delivered on his campaign promises, and has absolutely shocked the world with his actions. Cannot wait to see what else he is planning.
It has been 70 days since President Trump has taken office, and boy what a ride it has been. President Trump, with Elon Musk at his side, have absolutely destroyed the Democrat planned destruction of the America (as state by Soros: "We will fundamentally change American") and has those cockroaches running for cover.
In just a little over 2 months, President Trump has more than delivered on his campaign promises, and has absolutely shocked the world with his actions. Cannot wait to see what else he is planning.
President Trump Is On The Warpath
And Hs Enemies Are in Reeling.
Turn out, the greatest enemies of President Trump's agenda is NOT the Democrat Congress, but rogue judges.
Note the first 5 are (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judges
(Source: Grok on X)
Judge James Boasberg (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia): As the chief judge of this court, Boasberg, an Obama appointee, temporarily halted Trump’s deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members in March 2025. Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify the deportations, but Boasberg paused the action for two weeks, questioning its legality. When the administration proceeded anyway, Boasberg ordered the planes to turn back, though compliance was incomplete, raising concerns about a potential constitutional standoff. Trump publicly called for Boasberg’s impeachment, labeling him a “Radical Left Lunatic,” prompting a rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts.
Judge Beryl Howell (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia): Another Obama appointee, Howell has been a frequent target of Trump administration criticism. In March 2025, she blocked an executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie, ruling it unconstitutional. She accused the Justice Department of undermining the judiciary with personal attacks against her, denying their motion to disqualify her from the case. Howell also ruled against Trump in other instances, though she has occasionally sided with the administration, showing a mixed record.
Judge Ana Reyes (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia): A Biden appointee, Reyes is overseeing a case challenging Trump’s executive order barring transgender individuals from military service. LGBTQ advocacy groups sought a preliminary injunction, and Reyes was expected to rule by late March 2025. Her involvement marks her as part of the cohort of D.C. judges clashing with Trump’s agenda.
Judge William H. Alsup (Northern District of California): In March 2025, Alsup, a Clinton appointee, ordered six federal agencies to reinstate thousands of probationary employees fired under Trump’s downsizing efforts. He criticized the administration’s mass terminations as unjustified, and when agencies placed rehired workers on administrative leave, he demanded compliance reports. The Trump administration appealed this to the Supreme Court, arguing Alsup overstepped his authority.
Judge Amir Ali (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia): A Biden appointee, Ali issued a temporary restraining order in February 2025, upheld by the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision, forcing the Trump administration to release nearly $2 billion in foreign aid. His rulings have countered Trump’s attempts to freeze congressionally approved funds, drawing significant attention.
Judge John McConnell Jr. (U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island): McConnell found in February 2025 that the Trump administration defied his earlier order to unfreeze federal grants, ordering immediate compliance. This led to impeachment threats from some Republicans, including Representative Andrew Clyde of Georgia.
Judge John Coughenour (Western District of Washington): In February 2025, Coughenour issued a nationwide injunction against Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship, calling the president’s approach to the rule of law an “impediment” to be navigated or ignored.
Other judges, like Jesse Furman (Southern District of New York), Loren AliKhan (D.C.), Leo T. Sorokin (Massachusetts), and John D. Bates (D.C.), have also issued rulings blocking specific Trump actions, such as deportations, federal funding freezes, and health data removals.
These judges span appointments from Democratic presidents (Obama, Biden, Clinton) and, in some cases, Republicans (Reagan, Bush), showing the resistance isn’t strictly partisan.
The Trump administration and allies, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and Elon Musk, have accused these judges of bias and overreach, with Bondi arguing in late March 2025 that some should be removed for lacking objectivity.
Posts on X and media reports highlight a narrative from Trump supporters labeling these judges—especially Howell, Reyes, and Boasberg—as “crooked” or “activist.” However, Chief Justice Roberts and legal experts have pushed back, asserting that impeachment over rulings is unconstitutional and that judicial review is a cornerstone of checks and balances.
This list isn’t exhaustive, as new rulings emerge daily, but these judges represent the most prominent examples based on current data. Their actions reflect a broader judicial pushback against Trump’s aggressive use of executive power, though the ultimate outcomes may hinge on appeals to higher courts, including the Supreme Court.
Note the first 5 are (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judges
(Source: Grok on X)
Judge James Boasberg (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia): As the chief judge of this court, Boasberg, an Obama appointee, temporarily halted Trump’s deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members in March 2025. Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify the deportations, but Boasberg paused the action for two weeks, questioning its legality. When the administration proceeded anyway, Boasberg ordered the planes to turn back, though compliance was incomplete, raising concerns about a potential constitutional standoff. Trump publicly called for Boasberg’s impeachment, labeling him a “Radical Left Lunatic,” prompting a rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts.
Judge Beryl Howell (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia): Another Obama appointee, Howell has been a frequent target of Trump administration criticism. In March 2025, she blocked an executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie, ruling it unconstitutional. She accused the Justice Department of undermining the judiciary with personal attacks against her, denying their motion to disqualify her from the case. Howell also ruled against Trump in other instances, though she has occasionally sided with the administration, showing a mixed record.
Judge Ana Reyes (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia): A Biden appointee, Reyes is overseeing a case challenging Trump’s executive order barring transgender individuals from military service. LGBTQ advocacy groups sought a preliminary injunction, and Reyes was expected to rule by late March 2025. Her involvement marks her as part of the cohort of D.C. judges clashing with Trump’s agenda.
Judge William H. Alsup (Northern District of California): In March 2025, Alsup, a Clinton appointee, ordered six federal agencies to reinstate thousands of probationary employees fired under Trump’s downsizing efforts. He criticized the administration’s mass terminations as unjustified, and when agencies placed rehired workers on administrative leave, he demanded compliance reports. The Trump administration appealed this to the Supreme Court, arguing Alsup overstepped his authority.
Judge Amir Ali (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia): A Biden appointee, Ali issued a temporary restraining order in February 2025, upheld by the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision, forcing the Trump administration to release nearly $2 billion in foreign aid. His rulings have countered Trump’s attempts to freeze congressionally approved funds, drawing significant attention.
Judge John McConnell Jr. (U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island): McConnell found in February 2025 that the Trump administration defied his earlier order to unfreeze federal grants, ordering immediate compliance. This led to impeachment threats from some Republicans, including Representative Andrew Clyde of Georgia.
Judge John Coughenour (Western District of Washington): In February 2025, Coughenour issued a nationwide injunction against Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship, calling the president’s approach to the rule of law an “impediment” to be navigated or ignored.
Other judges, like Jesse Furman (Southern District of New York), Loren AliKhan (D.C.), Leo T. Sorokin (Massachusetts), and John D. Bates (D.C.), have also issued rulings blocking specific Trump actions, such as deportations, federal funding freezes, and health data removals.
These judges span appointments from Democratic presidents (Obama, Biden, Clinton) and, in some cases, Republicans (Reagan, Bush), showing the resistance isn’t strictly partisan.
The Trump administration and allies, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and Elon Musk, have accused these judges of bias and overreach, with Bondi arguing in late March 2025 that some should be removed for lacking objectivity.
Posts on X and media reports highlight a narrative from Trump supporters labeling these judges—especially Howell, Reyes, and Boasberg—as “crooked” or “activist.” However, Chief Justice Roberts and legal experts have pushed back, asserting that impeachment over rulings is unconstitutional and that judicial review is a cornerstone of checks and balances.
This list isn’t exhaustive, as new rulings emerge daily, but these judges represent the most prominent examples based on current data. Their actions reflect a broader judicial pushback against Trump’s aggressive use of executive power, though the ultimate outcomes may hinge on appeals to higher courts, including the Supreme Court.
